Top-down and bottom-up estimates of anthropogenic methyl bromide emissions from eastern China

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract. Methyl bromide (CH3Br) is a potent ozone-depleting substance (ODS) that has both natural and anthropogenic sources. CH3Br been used mainly for preplant soil fumigation, post-harvest grain timber structural fumigation. Most non-quarantine pre-shipment (non-QPS) uses were phased out by 2005 non-Article 5 (developed) countries 2015 Article (developing) under the Montreal Protocol on Substances Deplete Ozone Layer; some have continued critical-use exemptions (CUEs). Under protocol, individual nations are required to report annual data production consumption quarantine–pre-shipment (QPS) uses, non-QPS CUEs United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). In this study, we analyzed high-precision, in situ measurements of atmospheric mole fractions obtained at Gosan station Jeju Island, South Korea, from 2008 2019. The background atmosphere declined 8.5±0.8 ppt (parts per trillion) 7.4±0.6 2019 rate -0.13±0.02 yr?1. At Gosan, also observed periods persistent (pollution events) elevated above decreasing continental air masses China. Statistical back-trajectory analyses showed these pollution events predominantly traced back emissions eastern Using an interspecies correlation (ISC) method with reference trace species CFC-11 (CCl3F), estimate China average 4.1±1.3 Gg yr?1 2008–2019, approximately 2.9±1.3 higher than bottom-up emission estimates reported UNEP. Possible non-fumigation sources – rapeseed biomass burning assessed, it was found discrepancy most likely due unreported or incorrectly QPS fumigation uses. These confined account 30 %–40 % global emissions. They delays introduction alternatives, such as sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), heat, irradiation, possible lack industry awareness need regulation use.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Event-Related Potentials of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processing of Emotional Faces

Introduction: Emotional stimulus is processed automatically in a bottom-up way or can be processed voluntarily in a top-down way. Imaging studies have indicated that bottom-up and top-down processing are mediated through different neural systems. However, temporal differentiation of top-down versus bottom-up processing of facial emotional expressions has remained to be clarified. The present st...

متن کامل

Distinguishing Top-Down From Bottom-Up Effects

The distinction between top-down and bottom-up effects is widely relied on in experimental psychology. However, there is an important problem with the way it is normally defined. Top-down effects are effects of previously-stored information on processing the current input. But on the face of it that includes the information that is implicit in the operation of any psychological process – in its...

متن کامل

Bottom-Up Beats Top-Down

In PEPA, the calculation of the transitions enabled by a process accounts for a large part of the time for the state space exploration of the underlying Markov chain. Unlike other approaches based on recursion, we present a new technique that is iterative—it traverses the process’ binary tree from the sequential components at the leaves up to the root. Empirical results shows that this algorith...

متن کامل

Combining Bottom-Up and Top-Down

We motivate the formulation of market equilibrium as a mixed complementarity problem which explicitly represents weak inequalities and complementarity between decision variables and equilibrium conditions. The complementarity format permits an energy-economy model to combine technological detail of a bottom-up energy system with a second-best characterization of the overall economy. Our primary...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1680-7316', '1680-7324']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5157-2022